The Context of
Cyberspace: Construction of Self and Community
The Internet is a site of cultural engagement – a place where people can
construct their own individual and group identities, as well as a place where
groups of people might be represented in stereotypical ways – such as women
being represented as sexual objects designed for the visual pleasure of men.
Communities can be represented as tourist attractions with a “disneyfied” sense
of diversity, or their communities can be represented as politically engaged.
Site designers use visual images, descriptions, and interactivity to construct
these various representations. When we analyze web sites and build sites of our
own, it's important to consider ethical questions: Who will have access to our
sites? How can those sites be used? How can we allow for diversity? How can we
avoid alienating visitors to our site without compromising our own beliefs? Are
we including information and representations on our sites that are sexist or
racist or homophobic? Have we built in measures for people with disabilities to
be able to navigate our sites?
Some thinkers are skeptical about the
promises of technology, believing that the Internet, for example, will become
just another corporate-dominated media outlet serving the interests of large
conglomerates. According to others, however, the Internet offers the promise of
democratizing the exchange of information, allowing more equal access to create
and consume messages about culture. Individuals have the opportunity to "hack"
into the matrix, creating blogs and web sites and mail distribution lists to
transmit messages that counteract stereotypical and oppressive information. The
following essay illustrates one writer’s struggle with this sense of agency. In
this essay, Derek Powazek describes his own experience hacking into the Matrix.
At first, he is excited by the prospects of working for
Wired magazine.
Then, like Neo, he feels himself devolving into a drone while the corporation
“kills off” those things that he loves. Finally, he is able to achieve his
own sense of agency on the web by creating an online community called
The
Fray for creative writers of cultural critique, a site devoted to creative
non-fiction and the establishment of a literary community on the web.
Reading 4: “Stoked: The Short
Story of a Year as a Cog in the Digital Revolution Machine” (Derek M. Powazek)
Go to
http://www.fray.com/work/stoked/Reading QuestionsAnalyze the
text
1. Why is Powazek initially stoked to be working
at Wired? Why does his enthusiasm wane? How and why does he get it
back?
2. Based on Powazek's experiences, what would you say that he
values about technology? What potential does it have for building
community?
3. What barriers are there to that potential?
Analyze the texture
4. Read the essay online at
http://fray.com/work/stoked/ How does your experience of reading this essay in
print compare with reading it on the web? Does the medium or the context affect
the message? What about the responses to Powazek that readers posted at the end
of the essay?
Analyze the context
5. In what way is Wired a part of the
Matrix? What is the relationship between corporate control and creativity,
according to Powazek?
6. Why did Powazek write this essay? Who is he
writing it for? How do you think his audience affects his style, his tone, and
his content?
7. How does Powazek relate to Camper?
In his essay, "Stoked," Derek Powazek discusses
his enthusiasm and then disillusionment working at Hotwired. What is his experience
like going from stoked to deflated to stoked
again? Which potentials of technology and the Internet make him feel
stoked? Which limits deflate him? What new discoveries help him to
feel stoked again? How do his experiences relate to
the ideas in Rheingold, Camper, and Gomez-pena?
Visual TextsImage 1: If you go to
Derek Powazek's personal web site at
http://powazek.com, you'll see the
following banner:

In this banner, Derek
Powazek, author of “Stoked,” is constructing a very specific identity for
himself. Look at the foreground, background, camera angle, relationship between
and prominence of objects, and use of text. Because of the camera angle, the
background is mainly sky, but also includes the very tips of houses as well as a
lamp post. We can tell that he’s standing in a community – community being a
central theme in his work. He is off center rather than being the central focus,
and balances the text on the left of the image.
1. What does this banner
say about Powazek as a creator, about his beliefs about design? What do the
terms and their order – “Author, Designer, Troublemaker, Person” – say about
him?
2. Look through his web sites at http://powezak.com and
http://designforcommunity.com to get a sense of his view of the Internet. Is his
identity consistent across the various sites?
3. When you look at
powazek.com, try looking at the source code for imbedded messages by pointing at
VIEW and dragging to SOURCE. Do these “hidden messages,” meta-tags, and alt
codes reinforce this identity?
Powezek saw the Internet as something new
and exciting because it created new opportunities and ways of doing things, new
opportunities for creative ventures. He saw it as a tool for expression and
community. However, with his experiences at Wired, he felt that Wired’s digital
project became corrupted from upper management who make it a business that’s
based on making money and lose touch with employees and their community of
readers: I watched as the company grew above me, and I stayed where I was. I
watched as the ranks of the upper management moved higher and higher. And the
futurists and dreamers at the top of the company seemed to flounder more and
more. they started killing the things we underlings were working so hard
on without bothering to tell us why. As a result, Powazek implies, the project
becomes more rooted in advertisements and the topics become broader. The
magazine cares more about making money than personal expression, freedom,
creativity, and social activism. It becomes more advertising-based so topics
become broader so that the general public won’t be offended by anything. Wired
Magazine, Powazek implies, serves advertisements rather than the public. In the
corporate atmosphere, Powazek might argue, there are many opportunities for
corruption and the lawyers and advertising executives kill off things that the
creative engineers love. It becomes more about money and power rather than about
public good. Although Powazek identifies digital space as potentially
corruptible by corporate interference, he also sees hope for a different kind of
space. Individuals can subvert the system by creating own sites for posting
creativity and cultural criticism. The Internet can be used in the
non-profit sector to build communities and bring people together and educate and
inform.
In response to his feeling of disenchantment as “a cog in the
digital revolution,” Powazek created
The Fray, an on-line community
dedicated to creative non-fiction. At this site, readers can submit essays,
often socially conscious and politically charged, under the subject headings of
criminal, hope, work, and drugs. These submissions are then reviewed and
selectively published. Each essay ends with a question that then prompts other
readers to respond on a bulletin board, building a sense of community. On the
submission page, the editors offer the following recommendations:
Image
2: Look at the layout design and content for "You in the Fray" at
http://fray.com/is/you/
You'll find this information:
Contribute to
Fray
Fray takes submissions from anyone with a story to
tell. And we believe that everyone does. There are only three rules:
1. Make it personal. (Use the word "I" or don't
write at all.)
2. Be honest. (Only true stories will be accepted.)
3. Keep
it under 1000 words. (Please!)
The best
submissions balance two goals: personal storytelling and emotional reflection.
Don't just tell us a story, tell us why it's important and how it affected you.
Remember that your story will end with a question for others to answer, so make
sure you answer it, too. Sometimes it helps to think of the question in advance
and treat your story as an especially well-prepared answer. Finally, remember
that {fray} is about personal storytelling. That means you should take us back
to a moment that mattered to you and tell us all about it, from beginning to
end, as if we were going through it ourselves. Your job is to make a stranger
feel what you felt. And please, no fiction, no poetry. That's not what we do
here. This is about real stories from real people.
One of the missions implicit in these recommendations
is to allow for diverse perspectives and personal voices to dominate the
conversation. This is a site for first-person narratives, a site for individuals
to tell their stories. As a collection, we may get a more diverse picture of
American culture. Read through some of the essays on the site (fray.com) to see
if the promise of diversity paid off.
The site also includes
information about face-to-face gatherings of writings to extend the community
into the real world. Powazek and his colleagues created and linked the
site to fray.org -a "real-life extension of The Fray" in which contributors meet
in local coffeehouses in San Francisco, Austin, Toronto, Boston, and other
cities in order to come out from behind the glass to read their works out loud
to live audiences. Look at the schedule of meetings and photographs of
those gatherings by going to
http://fray.com/events/. Do these gatherings seem to extend
the community into the real world. Would you be interested in attending one of
these gatherings? Do you think you'd be accepted there? Do you think that
everyyone would be?
The creators of The Fray also created The Fray Shop
(
http://fray.com/shop/), a
commercial site that sells Fray related memorabilia (currently limited to a few
different styles of T-shirts and stickers). Originally on the site, they
explained that this isn't a venture capitalist money-making scheme, but another
way of building community: Welcome to the fray shop. You can buy fray-inspired
stuff here (with your credit card, even). No, this isn't some sort of corporate
plot. I just thought it'd be cool to bump into someone on the street someday
who's wearing a criminal t-shirt, or someone with a hope sticker on their car.
Besides, any money raised here will go to support the fray organization. So take
a look around. And thanks for supporting the fray. -Derek What is the
relationship between this type of commercial site and others that you have seen.
How does this compare with a museum gift shop, for example. How do the producers
see this as another way of extending community?
How do these different
aspects -- the online culture, the face to face meetings, the material artifacts
and memorabilia -- how do they interact to create a particular type of
community?
Reading the Web
1Look through The Fray web site at http://www.fray.com and think
about the following questions:
Analyzing Text:
1. What is the general tone of the essays found
on The Fray? What do those essays say about the common values of the community?
What common themes arise that indicate what values the community members hold?
2. The end of each essay links to a collection of responses from
readers. Look through some of those. What is the general tone of the responses
to the essays at The Fray? What do those dynamics between essays and responses
say about the common values of the community?
Analyzing Texture:
3. What is the relationship between images and
words in architecture of The Fray? How do the producers use images to create
tone and reflect values? Choose 1 or 2 essays that demonstrate innovative
mixture of images, words, and ideas. How do the images and words work together?
Analyzing Context:
4. What is the target audience for the site? How
would you describe the typical >contributer in terms of age, gender,
socio-economic status, ideological values, belief systems, etc.
5. What
barriers are there to having participatory members in a web community? In what
ways and venues do the creators of The Fray work to make this an interactive,
inclusive community with participatory members rather than just passive
consumers? Give specific examples.
6. How might the designers of the
Fray do more to make it more inclusive and interactive? Again, give specific
recommendations.
7. Go to amazon.com and ebay.com and review them for
interactivity and community. What characteristics do they share with the Fray?
How do they work to build community?
8. The Fray is a site that joins
together creative writers and thinkers for activism. Look for other sites that
join groups together. Can you find a site aimed at a particular subculture with
shared beliefs? Look for sites for women or Latino/a activists or directed
toward African Americans or Gays and Lesbians. How is community fostered through
the site?
9. Does the fray accomplish those things that Rheingold and
Gomez-Pena argue for?. Reread that essay and re-examine The Fray for its
representations of community.
Reading the Web 2:
Conduct a cultural analysis of an electronic text as a site of cultural
engagement. Go to several of the following sites on the Internet:
As you
look through the sites, think about the relationship between the visual and the
verbal. Also think about the ways in which the site attempts to create
community, the ways in which it succeeds and the ways in which it fails. Try to
identify the different kinds of communities that are represented here and the
characteristics of an interactive, socially progressive community.
Now,
conduct a cultural analysis of an electronic text as a site of cultural
engagement. Look for other sites that serve as electronic communities -even
something as simple as your English department's web page. How do they build
community? Based on your previous analysis of The Fray, what more might they do
to create a stronger sense of community and interactivity? What might they do to
construct a site that has consequences for positive social change?
Digital Communities Based
on your answers to the previous questions, what
are the elements of community building on the web? In order to build community,
does a web site need a certain degree of interactivity -- a way for producers
and consumers to talk to each other? In order to build an ethical and
politically conscious community, does there also need to be a way for that
dialogue to be framed so that it focuses on critical issues and allows for
diverse opinions. What consistency does there need to be on a web site from page
to page? Can you find examples of cool web sites that do interesting things in
terms of community? What makes them interesting to you? Include their URL’s as
links on the board.
Secondly, what can we learn from this? In
what ways can you incorporate some of these ideas into your own web building?
How should we incorporate some of these ideas into a web site that links all of
our projects together?
Digital Culture
What do Powazek, Rheingold, Camper, and Gomez-pena have in common? In
what ways do they come up with different answers to the same questions?
DIGITAL
LITERACY CONCERNS
One thing that you can do is to create your own
web site with specific principles of digital literacy in mind. Your web project
could combine your classroom projects into an online portfolio for external
review. Or it could be a site that you build for a special interest community at
your college or in your neighborhood. Think about the multiple audiences for
your site and the ways in which it reflects your identity and your community. If
it is housed on your university’s server, it is a reflection of yourself as a
scholar, of the class as a site of learning about language and research, and of
the university as a institution of higher learning. In some ways, it could also
be a reflection of college students from your state and American college
students. In addition, it is your opportunity to intervene in the public sphere
with your own ideas – your own opportunity to make people think.
Consider
the following criteria for web building: readability, navigability,
hyper-textuality, and ethics.
Readability
- Choose font style and color and spacing to make the document easy to read.
- Eliminate typographical errors and surface flaws that lead to distraction.
- Avoid distracting animation and scrolling/blinking text.
- For multi-page documents, include a print-friendly version (all
information on a single page).
Navigability
- Make sure that all pages link back to the home page.
- Make sure all links work properly.
- Consider using a recurring menu for each page.
Hyper-Textuality
- Exploit the potentials of hypertext
- Create linked internal documents and menus.
- Link to provocative external sites
- Include provocative multi-media such as graphics, video, and audio
Ethics
- Be sensitive to audience needs
- Use Alt Text with graphics and sound files for vision and hearing
impaired.
- Attend to potentially "offensive" content that is gratuitous.
- Balance needs of general public with notions of artistic and academic
freedom and inquiry.
- Avoid stereotypically offensive imagery except in the interest of academic
inquiry or thoughtful satire.
- Ensure that your site is user friendly – readable, navigable, and clear.
- Be aware of multiple conflicting expectations of different audiences
(peers/family, instructor, administrators, general public).
- Contextualize each page so that your site’s author and purpose are clear.
- Include a "Last Updated" note on each page and appropriate contact links.
- Respect copyright within fair use guidelines.
- Attend to notions of academic rigor.
You can find other
suggestions for web building at
http://webstyleguide.com/
Web Building Project What if you
became an Internet writer? How might you engage with cultural ideology via
electronic text production? What if your ideas and your work became the cultural
text with which others would then engage? How would you utilize visual
representation? How would you utilize interactivity? How would you create
community or social action?
Think of a community that you belong to. It
could be a campus organization, a work community, a neighborhood, even your own
family. Design a web site that would appeal to the common interests of that
community and would function to strengthen community, though both visuals and
interactivity, and that would also promote social change of some kind --
community activism, social awareness, understanding across differences,
challenging or dispelling myths about your community.
First, plot your
web site out on paper. Think about how you would use fonts, colors, space,
images, hyperlinks, etc. Think about the messages that you would convey with
your web site through the use of these different elements. Next, choose a method
of building your web site. If you are advanced, you might use html coding. Or
you might use a program such as Netscape Composer or Frontpage to build your
site. Or you might create your pages in Microsoft Word and Save As HTML.
Finally, create and launch your site. Solicit feedback from site users
concerning ease of navigation, appropriateness of images, and usefulness of the
site features.